http://otw-staff.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] otw-staff.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] otw_news2011-11-13 06:33 pm

November 2011 AO3 Deploy and Reactions: an Apology from the Board

The Board would like to issue a public apology to our Support and AD&T staff and volunteers, our members, and the users of the AO3.

It is the Board's responsibility -- including the responsibility of the position I, Hele Braunstein, hold as Board liaison to both AD&T and Support -- to keep an eye on any organizational issues that would affect both the quality of the product put forward to our beta install and the amount of work and responsibility of our volunteers. It is, in addition, our particular responsibility to ensure that they are not blamed and held accountable in public for what are, at their heart, organizational failings.

It was the Board's responsibility to act on these failings, and avoid their having the impact that they, regrettably, have had.

As apologies are nothing if they are not followed by action, we can promise to take measures to avoid this happening in the future. The AD&T committee will work to figure out where we went wrong and what measures to take and guidelines to set to avoid it happening in the future. They will work with their current Board liaison, the Board as a whole, and their future Board liaison.

I especially apologize for being only able to set things in motion, as I'll not be returning to Board next term. However, I promise to be available to the people working on it next term as well, if needed.

Finally, and most importantly, we want to thank each and every volunteer and staff member who has worked on this, both before and after the deploy. Your work was not at fault, and it's deeply appreciated. Without you, and your efforts, OTW and its many projects would not exist.

Edited to add: This post was made in response to a number of conversations that were, and are, happening both inside and outside the OTW in reaction to the AO3 deploy; we find ourselves in the position of offering another apology as a result, as this post, in practice, proved to be opaque to the larger OTW community, which includes diverse interests in all our projects. To clarify, there were issues with the latest deploy to the AO3 -- the deploy was somewhat hurried, limiting the ability of our testers, coders, support team, and other staff to do their jobs, and making the process harder than necessary, both for our volunteers as well as for our users.

As a result, many volunteers were put in a position where they felt personally liable for larger organizational or group-level errors; this is why we, as a Board, felt it was necessary to acknowledge their distress and to respect their very hard work. They addressed many of the problems and corrected them within 48 hours -- we are grateful for their efforts, and wish to apologize for the necessity. (edits made 14 November 2011 5:00 UTC)

Mirrored from an original post on the OTW blog. Find related news by viewing our tag cloud.

[identity profile] oaktree89.livejournal.com 2011-11-13 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Hele, you have been totally awesome; don't even worry. It's definitely been an interesting 48 hours, but I think we can pull out of this without too much damage if users' voices are heard and responded to. This has been something of a "triage by fire" for me, haha, but I'm feeling good about things.

[identity profile] hlbr.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 03:33 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks! I think that more than worry we need to act, but I think we can pull through, too!

(Never going to forget that freudian slip, are you?)

hele

[identity profile] oaktree89.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 03:40 am (UTC)(link)
Too right.

(It was such an apt one, I couldn't help it! Sorry :P)

[identity profile] mrs-norris-mous.livejournal.com 2011-11-13 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Personally I can't see anything wrong with the deploy that happened a few days ago. I would say that people often complain when things change whether the changes improve things or make things worse. As a reader of fiction who doesn't use any special skin config noting significant has changed for me.

From what I read if I did want to customise the site than that would be simpler. But I can still read stories and that is the most important thing to me.

[identity profile] nestra.livejournal.com 2011-11-13 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)
There were problems with viewing the site on mobile devices.

[identity profile] mrs-norris-mous.livejournal.com 2011-11-13 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
So that is something I wouldn't normally notice. While it should have been picked up in testing, It sounds like it has been fixed within a 48 hours. I would be happy enough with that.

[identity profile] hlbr.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
Hi!

I'm glad you're not displeased with the changes!

The issues, though, went a little deeper than users' resistance to change -- the documentation was lacking, and the deploy was somewhat hurried, limiting the ability of our testing, support, and other staff to do their jobs, and making the process harder than necessary, both for our volunteers as well as for our users.

As a result, many volunteers were put in a position where they felt personally liable for larger organizational or group-level errors; this is why we, as a Board, felt it was necessary to acknowledge their distress and to respect their very hard work. They addressed many of the problems and corrected them within 48 hours - we are grateful for their efforts, and wish to apologize for the necessity.

hele (OTW Board)

[identity profile] whetherwoman.livejournal.com 2011-11-13 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Oooo... kay... As a member and casual user of AO3, this is pretty mysterious.

[identity profile] elayna88.livejournal.com 2011-11-13 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Ditto! I don't know what needs to be apologized for and can't tell from this post. I guess that's lucky for me, that it hasn't impacted me.

[identity profile] hlbr.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 03:51 am (UTC)(link)
Hi!

There were issues with the latest deploy to the AO3 -- the documentation was lacking, and the deploy was somewhat hurried, limiting the ability of our testing, support, and other staff to do their jobs, and making the process harder than necessary, both for our volunteers as well as for our users.

As a result, many volunteers were put in a position where they felt personally liable for larger organizational or group-level errors; this is why we, as a Board, felt it was necessary to acknowledge their distress and to respect their very hard work. They addressed many of the problems and corrected them within 48 hours - we are grateful for their efforts, and wish to apologize for the necessity.

hele (OTW Board)
minkhollow: (what is this i don't even)

[personal profile] minkhollow 2011-11-13 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Thirded; I'm completely flummoxed, as the only problem I've had is the autofill being a little slow.
(Then again, if it's mobile-device issues, as another commenter said, that's nothing I'd notice anyway.)

[identity profile] whetherwoman.livejournal.com 2011-11-13 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
It just seems odd to me that bugs from a new code deploy would be considered "organizational failings" calling for a public apology from the Board...? I feel like there must be something I'm missing.

[identity profile] imaginarycircus.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
http://bookshop.livejournal.com/1113476.html#cutid1

[identity profile] whetherwoman.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
Aha, thank you very much.

[identity profile] crunchy-salad.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
This post seems like making a mountain over a molehill to me. The poster may have a point about the candidates, I don't know, but the deploy was hardly "disastrous." A site, still in beta mind you, releases an upgrade that has some problems. They're quick to take user feedback into account and change things accordingly. I still don't see anything the AO3 did that they need to collectively apologize over, and it's unfortunate that they felt they had to.

But thanks for linking to this so we could get some insight into this apology.

[identity profile] imaginarycircus.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
I would say there was some overreaction yes, but if you read some of the linked posts there were also some very real problems that came to light about the way the OTW functions and releases thing.

[identity profile] crunchy-salad.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
I see. That's unfortunate; hopefully getting these things out into the open will help sort them out in the future.

[identity profile] hlbr.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 03:58 am (UTC)(link)
Hi!

There were more issues with the latest deploy to the AO3 than bugs -- the documentation was somewhat lacking, and the deploy was hurried, limiting the ability of our testing, support, and other staff to do their jobs, and making the process harder than necessary, both for our volunteers as well as for our users.

As a result, many volunteers were put in a position where they felt personally liable for larger organizational or group-level errors; this is why we, as a Board, felt it was necessary to acknowledge their distress and to respect their very hard work. They addressed many of the problems and corrected them within 48 hours - we are grateful for their efforts, and wish to apologize for the necessity.

hele (OTW Board)

[identity profile] crunchy-salad.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 05:01 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you for the clarification! It's too bad that the volunteers felt personally liable for all these mix-ups. Hopefully now that many problems have been addressed, they can relax a little and take pride in what they accomplished.

[identity profile] elementalv.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not on the board, and I'm not a volunteer for OTW/AO3, but if I had to guess, I would go with communication problems (i.e., one segment of OTW not being fully aware of what another segment was doing). If this were the case, it could explain the buggy deployment, because the issues weren't identified when they should have been -- in the QA process.

[identity profile] hlbr.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
Hi!

There were issues with the latest deploy to the AO3 -- the documentation was lacking, and the deploy was somewhat hurried, limiting the ability of our testing, support, and other staff to do their jobs, and making the process harder than necessary, both for our volunteers as well as for our users.

As a result, many volunteers were put in a position where they felt personally liable for larger organizational or group-level errors; this is why we, as a Board, felt it was necessary to acknowledge their distress and to respect their very hard work. They addressed many of the problems and corrected them within 48 hours - we are grateful for their efforts, and wish to apologize for the necessity.

hele (OTW Board)

[identity profile] hlbr.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 03:49 am (UTC)(link)
Hi!

There were issues with the latest deploy to the AO3 -- the documentation was lacking, and the deploy was somewhat hurried, limiting the ability of our testing, support, and other staff to do their jobs, and making the process harder than necessary, both for our volunteers as well as for our users.

As a result, many volunteers were put in a position where they felt personally liable for larger organizational or group-level errors; this is why we, as a Board, felt it was necessary to acknowledge their distress and to respect their very hard work. They addressed many of the problems and corrected them within 48 hours - we are grateful for their efforts, and wish to apologize for the necessity.

hele (OTW Board)

[identity profile] whetherwoman.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 05:19 am (UTC)(link)
Gotcha. Thank you for the explanation.

Thank you

[identity profile] psycho-tabby.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 03:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I have been away from LJ/net for awhile, so I don't have much background on the issues you are currently dealing with, but I do have some background on politics in volunteer groups and the different stresses that poses, and you all have my thanks and sympathy for the work you do.

I'd just like to let you know that I think OTW is doing an amazing job.. I hope you get enough good feedback, and I really appreciate the time everyone must be giving to provide the rest of us with such wonderful (and long-term) resources.

Re: Thank you

[identity profile] hlbr.livejournal.com 2011-11-15 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you for your support!

hele (OTW Board)

[identity profile] sarren.livejournal.com 2011-11-15 04:25 am (UTC)(link)
I think you all do a fantastic job and go above and beyond.

Thank you for making fandom just that much more awesome.