ciderpress (
ciderpress.livejournal.com) wrote in
otw_news2008-01-18 10:55 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Reminder: Third OTW Chat on Saturday, January 19, 2008!
A quick reminder, ladies and jellyspoons! We announced our plans for a third IRC chat on Saturday, January 19th at 20:00 AWT, 11:00 GMT and 06:00 EST with Cathy Cupitt from the board attending [in this post].
(You can also find instructions on downloading an IRC client for your particular OS and information on how we run our IRC chats in the aforementioned post.)
If you are planning to attend, please comment to the linked post with your screen name and your question by 14:00 AWT (19th), 05:00 GMT (19th) and 00:00 EST (19th) so we can gauge how much interest there is.
So far, we haven't had any confirmed participants. *g* As we mentioned previously, we will not be able to hold the chat unless at least ten (10) people commit to attending.
If there aren't enough interested participants in this time zone at this particular time, we'll reschedule the chat or find a different way to continue the public dialogue between OTW and all interested parties.
Thank you!
--
femmequixotic,
bethbethbeth,
ciderpress,
mirabile_dictu,
shrift,
svmadelyn
Community Relations Committee
(You can also find instructions on downloading an IRC client for your particular OS and information on how we run our IRC chats in the aforementioned post.)
If you are planning to attend, please comment to the linked post with your screen name and your question by 14:00 AWT (19th), 05:00 GMT (19th) and 00:00 EST (19th) so we can gauge how much interest there is.
So far, we haven't had any confirmed participants. *g* As we mentioned previously, we will not be able to hold the chat unless at least ten (10) people commit to attending.
If there aren't enough interested participants in this time zone at this particular time, we'll reschedule the chat or find a different way to continue the public dialogue between OTW and all interested parties.
Thank you!
--
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Community Relations Committee
no subject
I have arranged to be home in time, but don't have any questions myself ;)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's possible (she said, speaking entirely for herself for a moment) that we Yanks are more likely to show up at chats because we're yappier. :)
no subject
Or more likely, there are vastly more of you, so it's more likely that there will be some who can make the time. The fewer people are there, the more likely they'll all fail their availability roll *descends into D&D mode temporarily*.
no subject
no subject
Being a Brit and all that, I always use the version of the ladies/gentlemen, ladies/jellyspoons, ladles/jellyspoons (and in some places in America, I hear it is ladles/jellybeans, which delights me to no end) intro that the late, great Spike Milligan recorded as "Ladies and jellyspoons..."
:D
no subject
no subject
In case it does go ahead, my questions are thus, if anyone can ask them:
Also, is OTW aware of the access systems declaration (http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_310907), which, from tomorrow, "places obligations on all content service providers to check that individuals accessing restricted content provided in Australia are at least 15 years of age for MA15+ content or 18 years of age for R18+ content", and of recent moves by the Australian Federal Government to institute compulsorily ISP filtering (http://www.alp.org.au/media/1107/mscoit190.php) to all homes, schools and libraries? An archive containing fiction targeted at adults could easily be caught in such a filter. It is also worth noting that lists of banned sites are not currently made public, and that while it is possible to opt out of the proposed filter, the access declaration means that government is in a prime position to block content that violates Australian law even if you do opt out. Does the board plan to challenge the imposition of such censorship regimes? Do you have any alternative access plans in place in the instance the archive is blacklisted?
no subject