Proposed list of tags:fanarchive

[norah.livejournal.com]

A few days late - sorry, new job, hectic week. I tried to keep this concise and yet cover everything I could think of that might crop up. I've set it up to follow the two- or three-tier system that thefourthvine and I use in our sidebars, created by murklins. If a one-tier system is more desirable I can re-think this. The main categories are archives, fanarchive, features, and planning.

In the meantime, comments? Additions? Questions? Deletions? Have at!

archives:audience & community (suggested change: archives:users and community)
archives:history
archives:legal issues
archives:meta
archives:other archives
fanarchive:admin
fanarchive:weekly summaries
features:discussion
features:suggestions
(alternatively, the prior two could be subsets of "planning")
planning:coding
planning:design
planning:funding
planning:issues
planning:moderation
planning:people & volunteering
planning:resources & maintenance
planning:tools and software
planning:universal access

Questions thus far: do we need a "content" tag? If so, where might it go (under archives, planning, etc.)? Should universal access be under "planning"? Should "archives" be plural?

Comments

[rez-lo.livejournal.com]

Maybe, once everyone seems to have commented who wants to, publish the list again with the suggested changes listed next to the originals?

Gah. Information architecture gives me vertigo. I would think that "content" could fall under either "archives," as you suggest, if user-centered things like restrictions and interfaces and so on are the bigger concerns; or under "planning" if the issues have more to do with stuff like scalability, taxonomies, formats, and so on.

I'm pretty sure almost everybody knows more about this than me. *g*

Thank you again; this stuff is hard! Hope the new job's going well!